State Government vs vipin yadav — 759/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016122026

Filing Number

1435/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

759/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

490

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.vipin yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of Vipin Singh Yadav, accused in a fraud case involving cheating and forgery (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471). The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, noted the serious nature of charges carrying life imprisonment, and observed 46 similar criminal cases at the police station, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 759/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of Vipin Singh Yadav, accused in a fraud case involving cheating and forgery (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471). The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, noted the serious nature of charges carrying life imprisonment, and observed 46 similar criminal cases at the police station, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case