State Government vs Danish Kureshi — 751/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 174a. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010016032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1426/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

751/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

312

Police Station

SADAR BAZAR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 174a

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

Danish Kureshi

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

25-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

19-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Order

SUMMARY: The Mathura Additional Sessions Court granted advance bail to Danish Qureshi in a case under IPC Section 174-A (non-appearance before court) despite the State's opposition. The court found that while the original case (Section 366 abduction charge) had concluded with final police report, the Section 174-A charge arose solely from the accused's failure to appear despite non-bailable warrants and proclamation orders. Given the accused's lack of criminal history, assurances of cooperation in trial, and completion of investigation in the primary case, bail was granted on specified conditions including court cooperation, non-tampering with witnesses, and mandatory appearance during trial proceedings, with two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Mathura Additional Sessions Court granted advance bail to Danish Qureshi in a case under IPC Section 174-A (non-appearance before court) despite the State's opposition. The court found that while the original case (Section 366 abduction charge) had concluded with final police report, the Section 174-A charge arose solely from the accused's failure to appear despite non-bailable warrants and proclamation orders. Given the accused's lack of criminal history, assurances of cooperation in trial, and completion of investigation in the primary case, bail was granted on specified conditions including court cooperation, non-tampering with witnesses, and mandatory appearance during trial proceedings, with two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case