State Government vs Mahesh — 743/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015962026

Filing Number

1420/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

743/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

KOSI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1)
Arms Act Section 25,30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to accused Mahesh in a case involving charges under BNS Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 25/30 for allegedly attempting to fire a licensed rifle at the complainant. The court noted that no actual shot was fired, no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and the complainant is a relative with a property dispute motive, making the accusations questionable. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Mahesh in a case involving charges under BNS Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 25/30 for allegedly attempting to fire a licensed rifle at the complainant. The court noted that no actual shot was fired, no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and the complainant is a relative with a property dispute motive, making the accusations questionable. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case