State Government vs Mahesh — 743/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015962026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1420/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

743/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

KOSI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),
Arms Act Section 25,30

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

Mahesh

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

19-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

The court granted bail to accused Mahesh in a case involving charges under BNS Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 25/30 for allegedly attempting to fire a licensed rifle at the complainant. The court noted that no actual shot was fired, no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and the complainant is a relative with a property dispute motive, making the accusations questionable. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Mahesh in a case involving charges under BNS Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 25/30 for allegedly attempting to fire a licensed rifle at the complainant. The court noted that no actual shot was fired, no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and the complainant is a relative with a property dispute motive, making the accusations questionable. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case