State Government vs Kurshid alias Kussi — 733/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),352,317(2),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010015942026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1418/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
733/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
KOSI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Kurshid alias Kussi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 19-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, granted bail to accused Khurshid (alias Khassee) in a criminal case involving charges of robbery under sections 309(4), 352, and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that while the FIR was registered against unknown persons and the accused's name emerged only during investigation, there was no independent witness to corroborate the recovery, no prior criminal history mentioned by prosecution, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 12, 2026. Consequently, bail was granted on conditions including furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and undertaking to appear before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, granted bail to accused Khurshid (alias Khassee) in a criminal case involving charges of robbery under sections 309(4), 352, and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that while the FIR was registered against unknown persons and the accused's name emerged only during investigation, there was no independent witness to corroborate the recovery, no prior criminal history mentioned by prosecution, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 12, 2026. Consequently, bail was granted on conditions including furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and undertaking to appear before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts