State Government vs Kurshid alias Kussi — 733/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),352,317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015942026

Filing Number

1418/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

733/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

KOSI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),352,317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kurshid alias Kussi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, granted bail to accused Khurshid (alias Khassee) in a criminal case involving charges of robbery under sections 309(4), 352, and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that while the FIR was registered against unknown persons and the accused's name emerged only during investigation, there was no independent witness to corroborate the recovery, no prior criminal history mentioned by prosecution, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 12, 2026. Consequently, bail was granted on conditions including furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and undertaking to appear before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 733/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura, granted bail to accused Khurshid (alias Khassee) in a criminal case involving charges of robbery under sections 309(4), 352, and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that while the FIR was registered against unknown persons and the accused's name emerged only during investigation, there was no independent witness to corroborate the recovery, no prior criminal history mentioned by prosecution, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 12, 2026. Consequently, bail was granted on conditions including furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and undertaking to appear before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case