State Government vs Ravi kumar — 747/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010015902026
Filing Number
1415/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
747/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
FARAH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravi kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted conditional bail to accused Ravi Kumar in a case involving alleged snatching of gold earrings from a woman on 15.02.2026, causing her injuries. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, noting that the FIR was registered against unknown persons, no recovery was made from the accused, and no prior criminal history was established. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 747/2026
The court granted conditional bail to accused Ravi Kumar in a case involving alleged snatching of gold earrings from a woman on 15.02.2026, causing her injuries. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, noting that the FIR was registered against unknown persons, no recovery was made from the accused, and no prior criminal history was established. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts