State Government vs ramjilal — 727/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2),74,125. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010015632026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1392/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
727/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
NARHAULI Highway
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
ramjilal
Khemchand
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted anticipatory bail to applicants Ramji Lal and Khemchand in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, and 125 of the BNS. The court found that while allegations of assault and threats were serious, the applicants had no criminal history, the FIR contained procedural discrepancies (delayed filing without stated reasons, missing time details), and both parties were neighbors with prior disputes over an RO plant, warranting grant of bail with strict conditions including cooperation in trial, non-tampering with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted anticipatory bail to applicants Ramji Lal and Khemchand in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, and 125 of the BNS. The court found that while allegations of assault and threats were serious, the applicants had no criminal history, the FIR contained procedural discrepancies (delayed filing without stated reasons, missing time details), and both parties were neighbors with prior disputes over an RO plant, warranting grant of bail with strict conditions including cooperation in trial, non-tampering with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts