State Government vs upendra goswami — 714/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,323,504,506,427. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010015502026
Filing Number
1380/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
714/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
KOSI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.upendra goswami
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Mathura Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Dr. Upendra Goswami in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406, 323, 504, 506, and 427, arising from a land transaction dispute with complainant Kamal Singh. The court found that the applicant had not been arrested during investigation, had no prior conviction, and the matter appeared to involve a civil dispute, warranting protection from arrest subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 714/2026
Summary The Mathura Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Dr. Upendra Goswami in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406, 323, 504, 506, and 427, arising from a land transaction dispute with complainant Kamal Singh. The court found that the applicant had not been arrested during investigation, had no prior conviction, and the matter appeared to involve a civil dispute, warranting protection from arrest subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts