State Government vs dinesh urf bholu and others — 739/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 302,34,307,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015442026

Filing Number

1375/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

739/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

208

Police Station

NAUJHIL

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 302,34,307,147,148,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.dinesh urf bholu and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the bail application of accused Dinesh alias Bholu and Rakesh in a serious firearms case involving the death of one person (Udayveer) and injuries to another. The court found that the applicants were named in the FIR for allegedly opening indiscriminate fire along with co-accused, and considering the gravity of the charges under IPC sections 302/34, 307, 147, 148, 149, and 504, they were not entitled to bail, especially as bail applications of other co-accused had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 739/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the bail application of accused Dinesh alias Bholu and Rakesh in a serious firearms case involving the death of one person (Udayveer) and injuries to another. The court found that the applicants were named in the FIR for allegedly opening indiscriminate fire along with co-accused, and considering the gravity of the charges under IPC sections 302/34, 307, 147, 148, 149, and 504, they were not entitled to bail, especially as bail applications of other co-accused had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case