State Government vs dinesh urf bholu and others — 739/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 302,34,307,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010015442026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1375/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
739/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
208
Police Station
NAUJHIL
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
dinesh urf bholu and others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the bail application of accused Dinesh alias Bholu and Rakesh in a serious firearms case involving the death of one person (Udayveer) and injuries to another. The court found that the applicants were named in the FIR for allegedly opening indiscriminate fire along with co-accused, and considering the gravity of the charges under IPC sections 302/34, 307, 147, 148, 149, and 504, they were not entitled to bail, especially as bail applications of other co-accused had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the bail application of accused Dinesh alias Bholu and Rakesh in a serious firearms case involving the death of one person (Udayveer) and injuries to another. The court found that the applicants were named in the FIR for allegedly opening indiscriminate fire along with co-accused, and considering the gravity of the charges under IPC sections 302/34, 307, 147, 148, 149, and 504, they were not entitled to bail, especially as bail applications of other co-accused had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts