State Government vs RAMVEER — 695/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,326,308. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015232026

Filing Number

1357/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

695/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

192

Police Station

FARAH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,326,308

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMVEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Ramveer in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 326, and 308 (causing hurt, abuse, and grievous injury). The court found that the accused failed to establish prima facie that he was being falsely implicated, and considering the serious nature of the offense and the fact that other co-accused received regular bail (not anticipatory bail), the court dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Ramveer in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 326, and 308 (causing hurt, abuse, and grievous injury). The court found that the accused failed to establish prima facie that he was being falsely implicated, and considering the serious nature of the offense and the fact that other co-accused received regular bail (not anticipatory bail), the court dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case