State Government vs jagdeesh urf jagga — 689/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010015002026

Filing Number

1340/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

689/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Jait

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.jagdeesh urf jagga

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to accused Jagdish (alias Jag'ga) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, and 109(1) related to an alleged attempted murder during a village dispute resolution meeting. The court found that while the primary shooter was Surendra (alias Swaraj), no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and there was insufficient direct evidence against him, warranting conditional bail of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to accused Jagdish (alias Jag'ga) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, and 109(1) related to an alleged attempted murder during a village dispute resolution meeting. The court found that while the primary shooter was Surendra (alias Swaraj), no one was injured, the accused has no criminal history, and there was insufficient direct evidence against him, warranting conditional bail of ₹1,00,000 with two local sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case