State Government vs SATYAVEER SINGH — 670/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010014842026

Filing Number

1325/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

670/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

579

Police Station

VRINDAVAN

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYAVEER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Satyaveer Singh in a case involving alleged fraud and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2)). The court found that the applicant was clearly named in the FIR and involved in a criminal gang that defrauded the complainant of ₹41 lakhs through fake land documents, and noted that co-accused have already been granted regular bail while chargesheet proceedings are underway, making anticipatory bail unsuitable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Satyaveer Singh in a case involving alleged fraud and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2)). The court found that the applicant was clearly named in the FIR and involved in a criminal gang that defrauded the complainant of ₹41 lakhs through fake land documents, and noted that co-accused have already been granted regular bail while chargesheet proceedings are underway, making anticipatory bail unsuitable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case