State Government vs SATYAVEER SINGH — 670/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010014842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1325/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
670/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
579
Police Station
VRINDAVAN
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
SATYAVEER SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Satyaveer Singh in a case involving alleged fraud and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2)). The court found that the applicant was clearly named in the FIR and involved in a criminal gang that defrauded the complainant of ₹41 lakhs through fake land documents, and noted that co-accused have already been granted regular bail while chargesheet proceedings are underway, making anticipatory bail unsuitable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Satyaveer Singh in a case involving alleged fraud and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2)). The court found that the applicant was clearly named in the FIR and involved in a criminal gang that defrauded the complainant of ₹41 lakhs through fake land documents, and noted that co-accused have already been granted regular bail while chargesheet proceedings are underway, making anticipatory bail unsuitable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts