Brajbhusan pandit vs State Government — 753/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010014112026
Filing Number
1262/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
753/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
KOTWALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Brajbhusan pandit
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura dismissed the bail application of Brajbhushan Pandit, who is accused of being a gang leader involved in organized crime including extortion, violence, and threats under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court found that the accused has four prior criminal cases related to robbery and is alleged to be the leader of a criminal gang, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent bail conditions required under Section 19(4-B) of the U.P. Gangster Act, which demands that the court be satisfied the accused is innocent and won't reoffend if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 5
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 4
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 753/2026
The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura dismissed the bail application of Brajbhushan Pandit, who is accused of being a gang leader involved in organized crime including extortion, violence, and threats under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court found that the accused has four prior criminal cases related to robbery and is alleged to be the leader of a criminal gang, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent bail conditions required under Section 19(4-B) of the U.P. Gangster Act, which demands that the court be satisfied the accused is innocent and won't reoffend if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts