Brajbhusan pandit vs State Government — 753/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010014112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1262/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

753/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

KOTWALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

UTTAR PRADESH GANGSTERS AND ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT, 1986 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

Brajbhusan pandit

Respondent(s)

State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

25-02-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura dismissed the bail application of Brajbhushan Pandit, who is accused of being a gang leader involved in organized crime including extortion, violence, and threats under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court found that the accused has four prior criminal cases related to robbery and is alleged to be the leader of a criminal gang, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent bail conditions required under Section 19(4-B) of the U.P. Gangster Act, which demands that the court be satisfied the accused is innocent and won't reoffend if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Mathura dismissed the bail application of Brajbhushan Pandit, who is accused of being a gang leader involved in organized crime including extortion, violence, and threats under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court found that the accused has four prior criminal cases related to robbery and is alleged to be the leader of a criminal gang, and therefore did not satisfy the stringent bail conditions required under Section 19(4-B) of the U.P. Gangster Act, which demands that the court be satisfied the accused is innocent and won't reoffend if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case