State Government vs saddam — 633/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 03rd April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010013892026
Filing Number
1247/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
633/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
GOVIND NAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.saddam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Session Court of Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Saddam in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 87 and 351(3) (allegedly abducting and threatening the complainant's daughter). The court found that the victim's own statement contradicted the allegations, with evidence suggesting she left willingly due to a pre-existing relationship and family pressure to marry another person. The accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 633/2026
Summary The Session Court of Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Saddam in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 87 and 351(3) (allegedly abducting and threatening the complainant's daughter). The court found that the victim's own statement contradicted the allegations, with evidence suggesting she left willingly due to a pre-existing relationship and family pressure to marry another person. The accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts