State Government vs Deepak saini — 607/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),123,127(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010013582026

Filing Number

1218/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

607/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

VRINDAVAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),123,127(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepak saini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted conditional bail to Deepak Saini, who was accused of rape, blackmail, extortion, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 64(1), 123, 127(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found that while the complainant was a married woman with children involved in an 11-month relationship with the accused, the FIR was filed suspiciously soon after his marriage to another woman, suggesting possible vindictiveness rather than genuine victimization. The court noted lack of video evidence, independent witnesses, and inconsistencies in the FIR, and ordered his release on a bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted conditional bail to Deepak Saini, who was accused of rape, blackmail, extortion, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 64(1), 123, 127(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found that while the complainant was a married woman with children involved in an 11-month relationship with the accused, the FIR was filed suspiciously soon after his marriage to another woman, suggesting possible vindictiveness rather than genuine victimization. The court noted lack of video evidence, independent witnesses, and inconsistencies in the FIR, and ordered his release on a bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case