State Government vs Bali alias ved prakash — 610/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2),(f),351(3),67a. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010013512026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1211/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
610/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
270
Police Station
MANTH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Bali alias ved prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Court at Mathura rejected the bail petition of the accused Bali alias Vedprakash, who was charged with rape, creating obscene videos, blackmail, and threatening the victim and her husband under IPC Sections 64(2)(f), 351(3), and the IT Act. The court found the allegations to be serious in nature, supported by the victim's testimony under Section 183 BNSS, corroborating witness statements from 11 others, and forensic reports on the viral videos, thereby denying bail on grounds that no justified reason was shown to establish false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Court at Mathura rejected the bail petition of the accused Bali alias Vedprakash, who was charged with rape, creating obscene videos, blackmail, and threatening the victim and her husband under IPC Sections 64(2)(f), 351(3), and the IT Act. The court found the allegations to be serious in nature, supported by the victim's testimony under Section 183 BNSS, corroborating witness statements from 11 others, and forensic reports on the viral videos, thereby denying bail on grounds that no justified reason was shown to establish false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts