State Government vs ashok kumar — 592/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010013262026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1188/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
592/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
Jait
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
ashok kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to Ashok Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 352 BNS, and the Arms Act (firearm incident on 08.02.2026). The court found sufficient grounds for bail after considering that no one was injured in the alleged firing, the prosecution provided no statement regarding conviction prospects, and the accused had been in custody since the incident date. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to Ashok Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 352 BNS, and the Arms Act (firearm incident on 08.02.2026). The court found sufficient grounds for bail after considering that no one was injured in the alleged firing, the prosecution provided no statement regarding conviction prospects, and the accused had been in custody since the incident date. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts