State Government vs ashok kumar — 592/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010013262026

Filing Number

1188/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

592/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

Jait

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352
Arms Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ashok kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to Ashok Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 352 BNS, and the Arms Act (firearm incident on 08.02.2026). The court found sufficient grounds for bail after considering that no one was injured in the alleged firing, the prosecution provided no statement regarding conviction prospects, and the accused had been in custody since the incident date. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 1

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted bail to Ashok Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 352 BNS, and the Arms Act (firearm incident on 08.02.2026). The court found sufficient grounds for bail after considering that no one was injured in the alleged firing, the prosecution provided no statement regarding conviction prospects, and the accused had been in custody since the incident date. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case