State Government vs Pinky — 566/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010012792026

Filing Number

1145/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

566/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

SURIR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pinky

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of accused Pimki under Section 108 IPC in a case involving alleged extortion and abetment of suicide. The court found credible evidence—including videos from the deceased's mobile phone—showing that the accused and accomplices threatened the victim with false rape charges and demanded ₹1 lakh, leading to his suicide by poison. The court determined there was no justified reason to believe the accused was falsely implicated and denied bail, finding the investigation ongoing and the case prima facie established against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 566/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of accused Pimki under Section 108 IPC in a case involving alleged extortion and abetment of suicide. The court found credible evidence—including videos from the deceased's mobile phone—showing that the accused and accomplices threatened the victim with false rape charges and demanded ₹1 lakh, leading to his suicide by poison. The court determined there was no justified reason to believe the accused was falsely implicated and denied bail, finding the investigation ongoing and the case prima facie established against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case