State Government vs Pohap singh — 537/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,109,118(1),131. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010012302026

Filing Number

1102/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

537/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

CHHATA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,109,118(1),131

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pohap singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Pohap Singh and Veerpal, who were accused of forming an unlawful assembly and attacking the informant's family with weapons and firearms on 11.01.2026. The court found the allegations serious and grave, involving active participation of the applicants in violent conduct, and deemed the case unsuitable for exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Section 482 B.N.S.S., with investigation still pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail application of Pohap Singh and Veerpal, who were accused of forming an unlawful assembly and attacking the informant's family with weapons and firearms on 11.01.2026. The court found the allegations serious and grave, involving active participation of the applicants in violent conduct, and deemed the case unsuitable for exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Section 482 B.N.S.S., with investigation still pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case