State Government vs Akash Pachori — 506/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010011782026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1054/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
506/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
603
Police Station
KOTWALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Akash Pachori
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Akash Pachauri in a fraud case (Crime No. 603/2025) involving allegations of organized loan fraud against SMFG India Home Finance Company. The court found that Akash, a 90% disabled person, was allegedly deceived by co-conspirators who misused his identity documents to obtain fraudulent loans worth ₹12 lakhs, with the funds being transferred to other accounts without his knowledge or benefit. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1 lakh with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Mathura granted conditional bail to accused Akash Pachauri in a fraud case (Crime No. 603/2025) involving allegations of organized loan fraud against SMFG India Home Finance Company. The court found that Akash, a 90% disabled person, was allegedly deceived by co-conspirators who misused his identity documents to obtain fraudulent loans worth ₹12 lakhs, with the funds being transferred to other accounts without his knowledge or benefit. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹1 lakh with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts