State Government vs veerendra kumar — 474/2026
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Govadh Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1955 Section 5a,8,11. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010011482026
Filing Number
1028/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
474/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
KOSI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.veerendra kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura granted bail to Veerendr Kumar, accused of cattle smuggling and illegal arms possession under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act, on a personal bond of ₹70,000 with two local sureties. The court found that while charges relate to recovery of cattle and mobile phone from the accused, the evidence is primarily based on police action with no independent public witnesses to the recovery, and the accused has no prior criminal history, warranting conditional bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 1
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 474/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge at Mathura granted bail to Veerendr Kumar, accused of cattle smuggling and illegal arms possession under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act, on a personal bond of ₹70,000 with two local sureties. The court found that while charges relate to recovery of cattle and mobile phone from the accused, the evidence is primarily based on police action with no independent public witnesses to the recovery, and the accused has no prior criminal history, warranting conditional bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts