State Government vs KOMAL PRASAD — 473/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,336,353,307,452,504,506,452. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010011342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1017/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
473/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
Mahavan
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
KOMAL PRASAD
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted interim bail to accused Komal Prasad in a 2016 case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 336, 353, 427, 452, 504, 506 and other laws, arising from a mob attack on a police station. The court found that while the accused was charged with participating in the assault on police personnel and damaging government property, the specific role of the accused was limited to being part of the crowd, medical evidence did not support the serious charge under Section 307, and the accused had no prior conviction. Bail was granted on conditions including full cooperation with the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearance, with a bail bond of ₹80,000 and two sureties required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted interim bail to accused Komal Prasad in a 2016 case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 336, 353, 427, 452, 504, 506 and other laws, arising from a mob attack on a police station. The court found that while the accused was charged with participating in the assault on police personnel and damaging government property, the specific role of the accused was limited to being part of the crowd, medical evidence did not support the serious charge under Section 307, and the accused had no prior conviction. Bail was granted on conditions including full cooperation with the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearance, with a bail bond of ₹80,000 and two sureties required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts