State Government vs KOMAL PRASAD — 473/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,336,353,307,452,504,506,452. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010011342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1017/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

473/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

Mahavan

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,336,353,307,452,504,506,452

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

KOMAL PRASAD

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3

02-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Hearing

18-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted interim bail to accused Komal Prasad in a 2016 case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 336, 353, 427, 452, 504, 506 and other laws, arising from a mob attack on a police station. The court found that while the accused was charged with participating in the assault on police personnel and damaging government property, the specific role of the accused was limited to being part of the crowd, medical evidence did not support the serious charge under Section 307, and the accused had no prior conviction. Bail was granted on conditions including full cooperation with the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearance, with a bail bond of ₹80,000 and two sureties required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura granted interim bail to accused Komal Prasad in a 2016 case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 336, 353, 427, 452, 504, 506 and other laws, arising from a mob attack on a police station. The court found that while the accused was charged with participating in the assault on police personnel and damaging government property, the specific role of the accused was limited to being part of the crowd, medical evidence did not support the serious charge under Section 307, and the accused had no prior conviction. Bail was granted on conditions including full cooperation with the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearance, with a bail bond of ₹80,000 and two sureties required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case