State Government vs JUGENDRA — 485/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109(1),3,(5),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010011312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1014/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
485/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
BALDEO
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
JUGENDRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to applicant Jugendra in a case involving criminal intimidation, rioting, and attempted murder (IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 3(5)). The court found that while the victim sustained non-fatal injuries to the knee, there was no evidence of prior convictions, and the applicant had been in custody since January 24, 2026, justifying bail on conditions including personal bond of ₹1,00,000, two sureties of equal amount, regular court attendance, and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura granted conditional bail to applicant Jugendra in a case involving criminal intimidation, rioting, and attempted murder (IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 3(5)). The court found that while the victim sustained non-fatal injuries to the knee, there was no evidence of prior convictions, and the applicant had been in custody since January 24, 2026, justifying bail on conditions including personal bond of ₹1,00,000, two sureties of equal amount, regular court attendance, and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts