State Government vs Sonu saini — 463/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),352,351(3),61(2),. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 24th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010011032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

993/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

463/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

791

Police Station

KOSI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),352,351(3),61(2),

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

Sonu saini

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

12-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Sonu Saini in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), and 61(2) related to a shooting incident. While the applicant claimed innocence and alleged false implication due to local rivalry, the court found that he was explicitly named in the FIR as accompanying the co-accused who fired the shot, causing serious injuries to the victim, and no justified reason for false implication was established. The court denied bail, holding that considering all facts and circumstances, there was no justified basis to grant bail before trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura rejected the bail application of Sonu Saini in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), and 61(2) related to a shooting incident. While the applicant claimed innocence and alleged false implication due to local rivalry, the court found that he was explicitly named in the FIR as accompanying the co-accused who fired the shot, causing serious injuries to the victim, and no justified reason for false implication was established. The court denied bail, holding that considering all facts and circumstances, there was no justified basis to grant bail before trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case