State Government vs himkar tiwari — 464/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,120b,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010011022026

Filing Number

992/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

464/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

6-Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52067

Police Station

Mahavan

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,120b,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.himkar tiwari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Grihkmar Tiwari and Chandraprakash Sharma, accused of forging documents and embezzling temple committee funds through fraudulent bank authorization letters. The court found no justified grounds for granting anticipatory bail considering the serious nature of the charges (IPC sections 420, 120B, 467, 468, 471) and dismissed the petition as the applicants' earlier bail request had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge Court No. 5

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 464/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Grihkmar Tiwari and Chandraprakash Sharma, accused of forging documents and embezzling temple committee funds through fraudulent bank authorization letters. The court found no justified grounds for granting anticipatory bail considering the serious nature of the charges (IPC sections 420, 120B, 467, 468, 471) and dismissed the petition as the applicants' earlier bail request had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case