State Government vs Sitaram — 391/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010009522026

Filing Number

857/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

391/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

928

Police Station

NARHAULI Highway

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sitaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of Sitaram, accused in a murder case (IPC Section 302) involving the death of Gulab Singh. The court found that the accused was properly named in the FIR, a chargesheet had been filed, and six prosecution witnesses had already provided testimony supporting the prosecution's case, making bail unsuitable at this stage of trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of Sitaram, accused in a murder case (IPC Section 302) involving the death of Gulab Singh. The court found that the accused was properly named in the FIR, a chargesheet had been filed, and six prosecution witnesses had already provided testimony supporting the prosecution's case, making bail unsuitable at this stage of trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case