State Government vs Devi Singh and others — 147/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,323,324,149,308,504,506. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPMT010008212026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
729/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
368
Police Station
KOSI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Devi Singh and others
-
2.Yadram
-
3.Chetan
-
4.Sitaram
-
5.Pitam
-
6.Raman
-
7.Narain
-
8.Smt Bhagvati
-
9.Samyvati
-
10.Sudha
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary Court: Additional Sessions Court, Mathura (Case No. 147/2026) Date: 23.04.2026 The court dismissed the discharge petition filed by the accused (Devi Singh and 8 others). The accused were charged under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 308, 504, and 506 for a violent altercation. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the investigator's report and medical records to proceed with trial, rejecting the defense arguments regarding delayed FIR filing and alleged fabrication of injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
17-Apr-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
24-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
20-Feb-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2026
Case Summary Court: Additional Sessions Court, Mathura (Case No. 147/2026) Date: 23.04.2026 The court dismissed the discharge petition filed by the accused (Devi Singh and 8 others). The accused were charged under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 308, 504, and 506 for a violent altercation. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the investigator's report and medical records to proceed with trial, rejecting the defense arguments regarding delayed FIR filing and alleged fabrication of injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts