State Government vs Ranjit Urph Chini Urph Pahadi — 126/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 18th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPMT010006982026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2026
Filing Number
609/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
VRINDAVAN
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ranjit Urph Chini Urph Pahadi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura convicted Ranjit (aged 22) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty (dated 13.02.2026). The court sentenced him to two months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500, with three additional days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; time already served in jail was adjusted against the sentence. The court accepted the accused's petition considering his poor, unemployed, and destitute circumstances with family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
13-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
21-Feb-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
13-Feb-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
30-Jan-2026
Charge
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura convicted Ranjit (aged 22) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty (dated 13.02.2026). The court sentenced him to two months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500, with three additional days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; time already served in jail was adjusted against the sentence. The court accepted the accused's petition considering his poor, unemployed, and destitute circumstances with family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts