State Government vs bablu and others — 275/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),110,352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010005662026
Filing Number
491/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
275/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
KOSI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.bablu and others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused (Bablu and Deepak) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, assault, and causing grievous injury under BNS sections 191(2), 115(2), 110, 352, and 351(3). The court found the bail request justified as no injuries were life-threatening, the accused had no criminal history, and they had been in custody since January 15, 2026. Each accused must furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including court attendance, no interference with witnesses, and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 3
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 275/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to the accused (Bablu and Deepak) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, assault, and causing grievous injury under BNS sections 191(2), 115(2), 110, 352, and 351(3). The court found the bail request justified as no injuries were life-threatening, the accused had no criminal history, and they had been in custody since January 15, 2026. Each accused must furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including court attendance, no interference with witnesses, and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts