State Government vs JEETU ALIAS JITENDRA — 260/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010005302026

Filing Number

457/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

260/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

SURIR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JEETU ALIAS JITENDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Jitu (Jitendra) in a case involving abetment to suicide under IPC Section 108. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly threatened the deceased Suraj with false rape charges, demanded ₹1 lakh, and repeatedly harassed him via phone calls, ultimately driving him to consume poison and commit suicide. Videos recovered from the deceased's mobile corroborated these allegations, making bail unjustified at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 260/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Jitu (Jitendra) in a case involving abetment to suicide under IPC Section 108. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly threatened the deceased Suraj with false rape charges, demanded ₹1 lakh, and repeatedly harassed him via phone calls, ultimately driving him to consume poison and commit suicide. Videos recovered from the deceased's mobile corroborated these allegations, making bail unjustified at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case