State Government vs JEETU ALIAS JITENDRA — 260/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010005302026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

457/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

260/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

SURIR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

JEETU ALIAS JITENDRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

12-02-2026

Hearing

30-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Jitu (Jitendra) in a case involving abetment to suicide under IPC Section 108. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly threatened the deceased Suraj with false rape charges, demanded ₹1 lakh, and repeatedly harassed him via phone calls, ultimately driving him to consume poison and commit suicide. Videos recovered from the deceased's mobile corroborated these allegations, making bail unjustified at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail application of Jitu (Jitendra) in a case involving abetment to suicide under IPC Section 108. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly threatened the deceased Suraj with false rape charges, demanded ₹1 lakh, and repeatedly harassed him via phone calls, ultimately driving him to consume poison and commit suicide. Videos recovered from the deceased's mobile corroborated these allegations, making bail unjustified at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case