State Government vs deepak — 245/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010004962026
Filing Number
430/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
245/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
KOTWALI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.deepak
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of accused Deepak in a dacoity case (FIR under Sections 310(2), 317(2) BNS). The accused was alleged to have robbed 3282 grams of raw silver and ₹75,000 from a complainant at Mathura railway station on 06.01.2026, with 456 grams of silver and ₹5,000 being recovered from him. The court found the charges serious and determined there was no reasonable basis to grant bail, as the accused failed to substantiate claims of being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 245/2026
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura rejected the bail petition of accused Deepak in a dacoity case (FIR under Sections 310(2), 317(2) BNS). The accused was alleged to have robbed 3282 grams of raw silver and ₹75,000 from a complainant at Mathura railway station on 06.01.2026, with 456 grams of silver and ₹5,000 being recovered from him. The court found the charges serious and determined there was no reasonable basis to grant bail, as the accused failed to substantiate claims of being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts