Shakuntla Devi vs Thakur annpurna Devi and Others — 2/2024
Case under U.p. Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act 1972 Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 23rd March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPMT010004252024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
38/2024
Filing Date
15-01-2024
Registration No
2/2024
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakuntla Devi
Adv. K karora
Respondent(s)
Thakur annpurna Devi and Others
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District Judge dismissed an application (181-G) seeking to substitute Respondent No. 2 (daughter of the deceased tenant) as Appellant No. 2/5 in a rent control appeal. The court held that under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Rent, Eviction and Rates) Act, 1972, a married daughter cannot be considered a family member of the tenant's succession since she has a separate marital home, and therefore lacks legal standing to be made a party to the appeal. Consequently, Application 181-G was rejected and the objection application 185-G was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District Judge dismissed an application (181-G) seeking to substitute Respondent No. 2 (daughter of the deceased tenant) as Appellant No. 2/5 in a rent control appeal. The court held that under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Rent, Eviction and Rates) Act, 1972, a married daughter cannot be considered a family member of the tenant's succession since she has a separate marital home, and therefore lacks legal standing to be made a party to the appeal. Consequently, Application 181-G was rejected and the objection application 185-G was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts