State Government vs rohitash kumar — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010001812026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
343
Police Station
NAUJHIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
rohitash kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 29-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Rovitash Kumar in a case under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide). The court found significant evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case: the FIR was filed 10-12 days late and amended from Section 103 to 108 BNS; the postmortem revealed no evidence of rape; the victim died by suicide (ligature mark on neck only); witnesses were all related to the complainant; and no corroborating physical evidence linked the accused to abetment. The accused was granted bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Rovitash Kumar in a case under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide). The court found significant evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case: the FIR was filed 10-12 days late and amended from Section 103 to 108 BNS; the postmortem revealed no evidence of rape; the victim died by suicide (ligature mark on neck only); witnesses were all related to the complainant; and no corroborating physical evidence linked the accused to abetment. The accused was granted bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts