State Government vs punit goswami — 86/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010001452026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

657

Police Station

VRINDAVAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

punit goswami

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

19-02-2026

Hearing

10-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura, granted anticipatory bail to Puneet Goswami in a case under IPC Sections 109(1) and 351(3) involving alleged assault with an iron rod. The court found that the complainant filed an affidavit on 16.12.2025 stating no cognizable offense was made out against the applicant, no eyewitnesses were named in the FIR, and no prior criminal history existed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura, granted anticipatory bail to Puneet Goswami in a case under IPC Sections 109(1) and 351(3) involving alleged assault with an iron rod. The court found that the complainant filed an affidavit on 16.12.2025 stating no cognizable offense was made out against the applicant, no eyewitnesses were named in the FIR, and no prior criminal history existed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case