State Government vs punit goswami — 86/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010001452026
Filing Number
128/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
86/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
657
Police Station
VRINDAVAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.punit goswami
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura, granted anticipatory bail to Puneet Goswami in a case under IPC Sections 109(1) and 351(3) involving alleged assault with an iron rod. The court found that the complainant filed an affidavit on 16.12.2025 stating no cognizable offense was made out against the applicant, no eyewitnesses were named in the FIR, and no prior criminal history existed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2026
Summary The Sessions Court, Mathura, granted anticipatory bail to Puneet Goswami in a case under IPC Sections 109(1) and 351(3) involving alleged assault with an iron rod. The court found that the complainant filed an affidavit on 16.12.2025 stating no cognizable offense was made out against the applicant, no eyewitnesses were named in the FIR, and no prior criminal history existed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts