State Government vs shailendra kushwah — 75/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,115(2),238. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMT010001312026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

05-01-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, Mathura

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

599

Police Station

GOVARDHAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,115(2),238

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

shailendra kushwah

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Hearing

12-02-2026

Hearing

28-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, Mathura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case