State Government vs shailendra kushwah — 75/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,115(2),238. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010001312026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
75/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
599
Police Station
GOVARDHAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.shailendra kushwah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2026
Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts