State Government vs shailendra kushwah — 75/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,115(2),238. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMT010001312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
75/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
599
Police Station
GOVARDHAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
shailendra kushwah
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Court in Mathura granted conditional bail to Shailendra Kushwah, accused of abetting his wife Karishma's suicide through harassment and domestic violence under IPC sections 108, 115(2), and 238. The court found that while the suicide was established fact, whether the accused actually instigated it remains a question for trial evidence, and as he had no prior criminal convictions, bail was justified on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court attendance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts