ganesh gautam vs vinod gautam and Othrs — 4/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 290. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPMT010000262025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
02-Jan-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
02-Jan-2025
Court
District and Session Judge, Mathura
Judge
7-Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ganesh gautam
Adv. mayank upadhyay
Respondent(s)
-
1.vinod gautam and Othrs
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
04-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The Additional District Judge, Mathura, allowed a petition challenging the court fee calculation on Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) certificates valued at ₹13,70,000 found in locker no. 159. The court set aside the Munseriff's report that imposed 8.75% court fee (₹1,19,875) and directed recalculation, holding that since the KVPs were already issued in the names of parties to the case and constitute existing property, ad-valorem court fee was unjustified. The court also directed the Munseriff to provide a separate fee assessment for gold and silver (valued at ₹1,30,43,333) held in the same locker before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
31-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge Court No. 6
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-May-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2025
SUMMARY: The Additional District Judge, Mathura, allowed a petition challenging the court fee calculation on Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) certificates valued at ₹13,70,000 found in locker no. 159. The court set aside the Munseriff's report that imposed 8.75% court fee (₹1,19,875) and directed recalculation, holding that since the KVPs were already issued in the names of parties to the case and constitute existing property, ad-valorem court fee was unjustified. The court also directed the Munseriff to provide a separate fee assessment for gold and silver (valued at ₹1,30,43,333) held in the same locker before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts