State Of U.P vs saroj — 95/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8/21. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPMP010009922026

Filing Number

931/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8/21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of U.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.saroj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary: State of U.P v. Saroj (Case 95/2026) The ADJ I Mainpuri court granted Saroj's petition to release her seized motorcycle (UP 76 AQ 2964). Saroj, the registered owner, was neither made an accused nor found complicit in the NDPS drug case filed against her son Nitin Babu and co-accused Raju. The court held that vehicle owners have custody rights unless they are accused or proven actively involved in the crime. Citing Supreme Court precedent, it ordered the motorcycle's conditional release upon Saroj depositing ₹1,50,000 personal bond and security, with restrictions against sale or physical alteration pending case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of U.P v. Saroj (Case 95/2026) The ADJ I Mainpuri court granted Saroj's petition to release her seized motorcycle (UP 76 AQ 2964). Saroj, the registered owner, was neither made an accused nor found complicit in the NDPS drug case filed against her son Nitin Babu and co-accused Raju. The court held that vehicle owners have custody rights unless they are accused or proven actively involved in the crime. Citing Supreme Court precedent, it ordered the motorcycle's conditional release upon Saroj depositing ₹1,50,000 personal bond and security, with restrictions against sale or physical alteration pending case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case