udal urf dinesh vs State Of U.P — 364/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMP010008752026
Filing Number
819/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
364/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-ADJ IV
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
669
Police Station
BEWAR
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.udal urf dinesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of U.P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Case Summary: The court granted bail to Udal alias Dinesh (38 years), accused under IPC Section 307 in a 2008 attempt-to-murder case. The petitioner argued he was falsely implicated due to village factionalism and that his wife's illness caused his absence from court proceedings. The court accepted the bail petition based on the overall facts and circumstances, noting the accused had previously been on bail and had been detained since February 24, 2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions requiring the accused's cooperation in trial proceedings and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ IV
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ IV
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 364/2026
Case Summary: The court granted bail to Udal alias Dinesh (38 years), accused under IPC Section 307 in a 2008 attempt-to-murder case. The petitioner argued he was falsely implicated due to village factionalism and that his wife's illness caused his absence from court proceedings. The court accepted the bail petition based on the overall facts and circumstances, noting the accused had previously been on bail and had been detained since February 24, 2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions requiring the accused's cooperation in trial proceedings and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts