balakram vs State Of U.P — 346/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMP010008442026

Filing Number

789/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

346/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

ALLAU

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),352
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.balakram

  2. 2.kiran

  3. 3.meenu

  4. 4.Amit kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of U.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The District & Session Judge, Mainpuri granted advance bail to four accused (Balakram, Kiran, Minu, and Amit Kumar) in a dowry harassment case filed under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence of the allegations and noted discrepancies in the FIR (registered 3 days after the alleged incident), accepting the accused's plea that the case was fabricated by the complainant. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Session Judge, Mainpuri granted advance bail to four accused (Balakram, Kiran, Minu, and Amit Kumar) in a dowry harassment case filed under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence of the allegations and noted discrepancies in the FIR (registered 3 days after the alleged incident), accepting the accused's plea that the case was fabricated by the complainant. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case