balram urf balla vs State Of U.P — 362/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPMP010006262026

Case disposed

Filing Number

586/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

N.D.P.S.Act Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

balram urf balla

Respondent(s)

State Of U.P

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

24-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of document.

SUMMARY: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, rejected the bail application of Balram alias Balla under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act. The court found that 530 grams of charas (hashish) was recovered from the applicant's possession, which exceeds the small quantity threshold, and noted his criminal history and the serious nature of the offense. The court dismissed the applicant's arguments challenging the credibility of the FIR and held that sufficient grounds existed to deny bail based on the quantity of contraband seized, the gravity of the offense, and the applicant's prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, rejected the bail application of Balram alias Balla under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act. The court found that 530 grams of charas (hashish) was recovered from the applicant's possession, which exceeds the small quantity threshold, and noted his criminal history and the serious nature of the offense. The court dismissed the applicant's arguments challenging the credibility of the FIR and held that sufficient grounds existed to deny bail based on the quantity of contraband seized, the gravity of the offense, and the applicant's prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case