State Of U.P vs MANVENDAR @ Kallu Advocate - Satya Pal Singh — 900547/2007

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

Session Trial

CNR: UPMP010003812007

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

900547/2007

Filing Date

03-09-2007

Registration No

900547/2007

Registration Date

03-09-2009

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

VICHAWAN

Year

2005

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment ),Act,1984(Bihar) Section 7

Petitioner(s)

State Of U.P

Adv. Pushpendra Dubey

Respondent(s)

MANVENDAR @ Kallu Advocate - Satya Pal Singh

Bhunandra

Adv. Satya Pal Singh

Jhumka @ Shivpal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

25-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

17-02-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
copy of Judgement

Summary The court acquitted three accused individuals (Manavendra alias Kallu, Bhuvendra, and Jhumka alias Shivpal) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307/149 and the Criminal Amendment Act. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting significant contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding the alleged armed confrontation on 07.02.2005, lack of corroborating eyewitnesses, and absence of physical evidence to support the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted three accused individuals (Manavendra alias Kallu, Bhuvendra, and Jhumka alias Shivpal) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307/149 and the Criminal Amendment Act. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting significant contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding the alleged armed confrontation on 07.02.2005, lack of corroborating eyewitnesses, and absence of physical evidence to support the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case