State Government vs Yogendr — 876/2009
Case under Arms Act Section 4/25. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
CRI. CASE(Old)
CNR: UPMO240004562009
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Date
17-06-2009
Registration No
876/2009
Registration Date
17-06-2009
Court
Civil Judge Junior Divison Thakurdwara
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div., Thakurdwara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Yogendr
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Div., Thakurdwara
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 17-11-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 22-09-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 04-08-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thakurdwara, granted bail to accused Yogendra in Case No. 876/2009 under Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 60 of the Excise Act, Bhojpur police station. The accused was previously on bail but failed to appear on scheduled dates, leading to the issuance of a warrant; however, since he did not misuse the previous bail and has been in district jail since December 8, 2018, the bail petition was approved. The condition imposed is that he must furnish two sureties of ₹20,000 each and a personal bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thakurdwara, granted bail to accused Yogendra in Case No. 876/2009 under Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 60 of the Excise Act, Bhojpur police station. The accused was previously on bail but failed to appear on scheduled dates, leading to the issuance of a warrant; however, since he did not misuse the previous bail and has been in district jail since December 8, 2018, the bail petition was approved. The condition imposed is that he must furnish two sureties of ₹20,000 each and a personal bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts