UP State vs PAPPU URF MAHESH PAHADE Advocate - Ch. Anil Kumar Singh — 992/2018
Case under Arms Act Section 3,25. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Session Trial(Old)
CNR: UPMO010122082018
Filing Number
2004794/2018
Filing Date
13-12-2018
Registration No
992/2018
Registration Date
13-12-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 3 Moradabad
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UP State
Adv. NO
Respondent(s)
PAPPU URF MAHESH PAHADE Advocate - Ch. Anil Kumar Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 3 Moradabad
Disposed
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
| 27-02-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Moradabad Sessions Court acquitted all accused in four consolidated cases on March 11, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove murder charges (Section 302/34, 120B IPC) against Pappu alias Mahesh Pahari, Amit Kumar, Vikas Kumar, and Vimal Kumar. The court also acquitted accused Mahesh of illegal firearms charges (Section 3/25 Arms Act) and attempted murder (Section 307 IPC). The judge ruled that credible eye-witnesses were absent, key prosecution witnesses contradicted each other or turned hostile, and the prosecution could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Moradabad Sessions Court acquitted all accused in four consolidated cases on March 11, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove murder charges (Section 302/34, 120B IPC) against Pappu alias Mahesh Pahari, Amit Kumar, Vikas Kumar, and Vimal Kumar. The court also acquitted accused Mahesh of illegal firearms charges (Section 3/25 Arms Act) and attempted murder (Section 307 IPC). The judge ruled that credible eye-witnesses were absent, key prosecution witnesses contradicted each other or turned hostile, and the prosecution could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts