SIFATUN NAVI KHAN S/O LATE INAYAT NABI KHAN vs UP State THROUGH D G C CRIMINAL MORADABAD Advocate - D G C CRIMINAL MORADABAD — 297/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th March 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPMO010084532023

Case disposed

Filing Number

7417/2023

Filing Date

21-08-2023

Registration No

297/2023

Registration Date

21-08-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397

Petitioner(s)

SIFATUN NAVI KHAN S/O LATE INAYAT NABI KHAN

Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

UP State THROUGH D G C CRIMINAL MORADABAD Advocate - D G C CRIMINAL MORADABAD

SMT SHAISHTA NOOR W/O NOORUN NABI KHAN MARHOOM

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

06-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Judgement

26-02-2026

Hearing

25-02-2026

Hearing

17-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Judgement

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Revision Petition No. 56767/2022) has set aside the lower court's order dated 26.07.2023, finding that it was passed with illegality and material irregularity in violation of justice, rules, and facts. The court determined that sufficient evidence existed in the record to frame charges against the accused under IPC Sections 452, 504, and 506, and accordingly quashed the lower magistrate's order dismissing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Revision Petition No. 56767/2022) has set aside the lower court's order dated 26.07.2023, finding that it was passed with illegality and material irregularity in violation of justice, rules, and facts. The court determined that sufficient evidence existed in the record to frame charges against the accused under IPC Sections 452, 504, and 506, and accordingly quashed the lower magistrate's order dismissing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case