UP State vs MOHD WASI S/O MOHD YAMEEN — 1053/2020
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED and FINED on 06th March 2026.
Police Challan Case(Old) - Warrant Or Summons Criminal Cases(Old)
CNR: UPMO010059732020
Filing Number
5448/2020
Filing Date
25-09-2020
Registration No
1053/2020
Registration Date
25-09-2020
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Moradabad
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED and FINED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UP State
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
MOHD WASI S/O MOHD YAMEEN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Moradabad
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 31-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Court in Meerut found the accused, Mr. Vasi (son of Yaseen), guilty under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act for illegal possession of 505 grams of charas (hashish) recovered during his arrest on December 3, 2019. The court sentenced him to 1 year and 1 month imprisonment plus a fine of ₹3,000 (with 5 additional days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), considering his confession of guilt and his impoverished circumstances as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Court in Meerut found the accused, Mr. Vasi (son of Yaseen), guilty under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act for illegal possession of 505 grams of charas (hashish) recovered during his arrest on December 3, 2019. The court sentenced him to 1 year and 1 month imprisonment plus a fine of ₹3,000 (with 5 additional days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), considering his confession of guilt and his impoverished circumstances as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts