BHAGWAT SARAN S/O LATE PRAMCHAND vs SMT SHANTI DEVI W/O ASHOK KUMAR SIKKA — 17/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPMO010047522022
Filing Number
377/2022
Filing Date
16-05-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
16-05-2022
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 3 Moradabad
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAGWAT SARAN S/O LATE PRAMCHAND
Adv. ATAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
SMT SHANTI DEVI W/O ASHOK KUMAR SIKKA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 3 Moradabad
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 19-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Moradabad dismissed the appellant's petition to deposit rent under Section 30(1) of the U.P. Rent Control Act, 1972, and accepted the respondent's counter-petition on April 25, 2022. The appellate court upheld this order, finding no legal error, as the appellant's status as a mere licensee (not a tenant) and the existence of a pending eviction suit against him rendered rent deposit provisions inapplicable. The court confirmed that the appellant cannot claim statutory rent protection once eviction proceedings have been initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Moradabad dismissed the appellant's petition to deposit rent under Section 30(1) of the U.P. Rent Control Act, 1972, and accepted the respondent's counter-petition on April 25, 2022. The appellate court upheld this order, finding no legal error, as the appellant's status as a mere licensee (not a tenant) and the existence of a pending eviction suit against him rendered rent deposit provisions inapplicable. The court confirmed that the appellant cannot claim statutory rent protection once eviction proceedings have been initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts