amit kumar s/o jayditya sharma vs UP State Advocate - d g c civil — 51/2020

Case under Food Safety and Standards Act Section 70. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: UPMO010037722020

Filing Number

318/2020

Filing Date

02-Jul-2020

Registration No

51/2020

Registration Date

02-Jul-2020

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Food Safety and Standards Act Section 70

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.amit kumar s/o jayditya sharma

    Adv. gopal dwvedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UP State Advocate - d g c civil

  2. 2.chief food safety officer

  3. 3.abhit adhakari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Amit Kumar v. UP State (Civil Appeal 51/2020) The appellate court partially accepted Amit Kumar's civil appeal against a ₹50,000 penalty imposed under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The court reduced the penalty to ₹10,000, finding that while the food officer lawfully inspected Kumar's premises and collected misbranded special sonapapdi samples (lacking complete manufacturer details on packaging), procedural violations occurred—including failure to record proper witness signatures, lack of notice to the actual manufacturer (Chaturvedi Food Products), and defects in sampling documentation. The court ruled that Kumar, a small tea shop owner who purchased the packaged product for resale, should not bear full liability intended for manufacturers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  10. 13-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  15. 04-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  16. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  17. 18-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  18. 04-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  19. 29-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  20. 25-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  21. 19-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  22. 18-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  23. 20-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  24. 02-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  25. 01-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  26. 10-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  27. 01-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  28. 16-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  29. 20-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  30. 29-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  31. 01-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  32. 11-May-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  33. 01-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  34. 31-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  35. 30-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  36. 08-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  37. 07-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  38. 11-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  39. 07-Jul-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  40. 10-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  41. 13-May-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  42. 20-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  43. 04-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  44. 22-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  45. 09-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  46. 28-Oct-2020

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  47. 16-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  48. 07-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 02-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Amit Kumar v. UP State (Civil Appeal 51/2020) The appellate court partially accepted Amit Kumar's civil appeal against a ₹50,000 penalty imposed under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The court reduced the penalty to ₹10,000, finding that while the food officer lawfully inspected Kumar's premises and collected misbranded special sonapapdi samples (lacking complete manufacturer details on packaging), procedural violations occurred—including failure to record proper witness signatures, lack of notice to the actual manufacturer (Chaturvedi Food Products), and defects in sampling documentation. The court ruled that Kumar, a small tea shop owner who purchased the packaged product for resale, should not bear full liability intended for manufacturers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case