Monu Katiya vs UP State Advocate - SPO — 892/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMO010031732026

Filing Number

2888/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

892/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Moradabad

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

KATGHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20

Petitioner(s)

1.Monu Katiya

Adv. DESHBANDHU

Respondent(s)

1.UP State Advocate - SPO

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
28-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court granted conditional bail to Monu Katiya, arrested under NDPS Act Section 8/20 for possessing 496 grams of charas (hashish). The court found that the seizure lacked independent witness corroboration, the quantity was below commercial threshold, and the accused had been in custody since February 25, 2026, warranting bail on execution of personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Moradabad
25-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 892/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted conditional bail to Monu Katiya, arrested under NDPS Act Section 8/20 for possessing 496 grams of charas (hashish). The court found that the seizure lacked independent witness corroboration, the quantity was below commercial threshold, and the accused had been in custody since February 25, 2026, warranting bail on execution of personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.