MOHD. MURSHID ALIAS ZAFAR S/O MUKEEM vs UP State — 858/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMO010031152026

Filing Number

2832/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

858/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

KATGHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. MURSHID ALIAS ZAFAR S/O MUKEEM

    Adv. MASROOR ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UP State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 858/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of Mohd. Murshid Alias Zafar, who was accused of enticing away a 22-year-old woman (B.A. III year student) by promising marriage on February 19, 2026. The charges under IPC Sections 69 and 351(3) relate to wrongful restraint and criminal intimidation. The court found sufficient evidence of the offense—including the victim's statement that she was taken away under false marriage promises and threats, and a doctor's report confirming she was 28 weeks pregnant—establishing a prima facie case of a serious nature, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 858/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of Mohd. Murshid Alias Zafar, who was accused of enticing away a 22-year-old woman (B.A. III year student) by promising marriage on February 19, 2026. The charges under IPC Sections 69 and 351(3) relate to wrongful restraint and criminal intimidation. The court found sufficient evidence of the offense—including the victim's statement that she was taken away under false marriage promises and threats, and a doctor's report confirming she was 28 weeks pregnant—establishing a prima facie case of a serious nature, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case