ANIL KUMAR S/O MOHAN SINGH vs UP State — 793/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPMO010026792026
Filing Number
2419/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
793/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 10-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
KANTH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL KUMAR S/O MOHAN SINGH
Adv. AJIT SINGH BHARTIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UP State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 793/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad rejected Anil Kumar's application for interim bail on March 25, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient grounds to grant bail despite Kumar's arguments. The petitioner was accused under IPC Sections 109(1) and 3(5) (attempt to commit murder) in connection with a shooting incident on January 7, 2026, where his mother was allegedly shot by unknown assailants. The court considered that: (1) the victim's statement clearly identified Kumar's role in the conspiracy to kill her; (2) medical evidence corroborated the shooting; (3) the co-accused's bail had already been granted; and (4) the nature of the offense was serious. The court determined that the bail application lacked sufficient legal basis to warrant granting interim bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 793/2026
Case Summary: 793/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad rejected Anil Kumar's application for interim bail on March 25, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient grounds to grant bail despite Kumar's arguments. The petitioner was accused under IPC Sections 109(1) and 3(5) (attempt to commit murder) in connection with a shooting incident on January 7, 2026, where his mother was allegedly shot by unknown assailants. The court considered that: (1) the victim's statement clearly identified Kumar's role in the conspiracy to kill her; (2) medical evidence corroborated the shooting; (3) the co-accused's bail had already been granted; and (4) the nature of the offense was serious. The court determined that the bail application lacked sufficient legal basis to warrant granting interim bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts