KHALID S/O BABU vs UP State — 790/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMO010026402026

Filing Number

2386/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

790/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

MOONDHA PANDEY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHALID S/O BABU

    Adv. RAJENDRA KUMAR BHADORIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UP State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 790/2026 — Khalid S/O Babu v. UP State Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Khalid's interim bail petition on April 2, 2026. The court found that Khalid was falsely implicated in FIR 398/2025 (Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS) based on fabricated evidence. However, the court determined that the serious nature of the charges, combined with Khalid's alleged absconding and cooperation concerns, precluded bail at that stage of investigation. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the petitioner's claims of innocence and the allegedly fraudulent FIR—concerning a copper wire purchase where counterfeit goods were allegedly substituted—the court emphasized that at the preliminary stage, bail cannot be granted merely based on the accused's assertions without full adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 790/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 790/2026 — Khalid S/O Babu v. UP State Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Khalid's interim bail petition on April 2, 2026. The court found that Khalid was falsely implicated in FIR 398/2025 (Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS) based on fabricated evidence. However, the court determined that the serious nature of the charges, combined with Khalid's alleged absconding and cooperation concerns, precluded bail at that stage of investigation. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the petitioner's claims of innocence and the allegedly fraudulent FIR—concerning a copper wire purchase where counterfeit goods were allegedly substituted—the court emphasized that at the preliminary stage, bail cannot be granted merely based on the accused's assertions without full adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case